In medical training, the idea that viruses can cause cancer is taught as fact. Unfortunately, that claim is devoid of historical context, biological plausibility, as well as confirmatory evidence.
This is an excellent summary of the inaccuracies that are endlessly promoted in clinical research.
As to your last question “ What else did a bunch of nerds in a lab lie about to garner attention and funding?”
The entire somatic mutation of cancer theory is just as, if not more, flawed than the infectious origin of cancer theory.
I’m just completing a presentation & article about that.
It is called: “ Submolecular Dysregulation due to Deuterium Accumulation is the Cause of Cancer.”
I will include a link to this take down of the virology story.
Stay tuned.
This is an excellent summary of the inaccuracies that are endlessly promoted in clinical research.
As to your last question “ What else did a bunch of nerds in a lab lie about to garner attention and funding?”
The entire somatic mutation of cancer theory is just as, if not more, flawed than the infectious origin of cancer theory.
I’m just completing a presentation & article about that.
It is called: “ Submolecular Dysregulation due to Deuterium Accumulation is the Cause of Cancer.”
I will include a link to this take down of the virology story.
Stay tuned.