Of note, vacuum and forceps are still commonly used, especially vacuum. In areas where attending physicians are still present who were properly trained on the use of forceps, these are also still very common, in my experience.
It doesn’t make sense. One of my comments repeated four times. 🤷🏼♀️
I wasn’t quoting you, I was asking a question.
Do you understand the difference between a scientific theory and a layman’s theory?
I am not a doctor.
MDs are obviously in the tens of millions if you go back just a few decades. Well over a hundred million if we go back to when vaccines were introduced.
Exaggeration undermines credibility and isn’t something a person does if discussing in good faith.
How have they been indoctrinated? Do you know what that even means?
You think there was a cryptic message in the term medical profession? I’m very sincerely asking. How does the medical profession poison our poor?
I don’t think Covid is a novel disease. I know it is. There’s a reason it’s called COVID-19. I’m very interested if you have reputable citations that support otherwise. And curious what it was before 2019 if you don’t think it’s new.
I also don’t think vaccines work. I know they do. Nothing has studied more than vaccines and the evidence they work is overwhelming.
If this ends up posting multiple times I apologize in advance. I am only replying once.
The Israelites were told to circumcise infants on day 8. It is my understanding that vitamin K begins to rise on days 7 and 8. It’s obviously not a mistake but something that was intended and known (even though the didn’t know vitamin k specifically).
Absolutely fascinating thank you for your in depth reasoning, I had no idea of the underlying multiple systems.
I have a laymen’s question (one who hasn’t given birth to boot), would the letting the umbilical cord stay intact for longer which I’ve read is good for the baby help in any way with this also?
Many thanks. Vit K injections for a non-existent problem. Suits big pharma only.
All this predicated on the fear of possible bleeding, not actual bleeding occurring.
"Doctors have assumed for decades that this is a mistake of nature"
Which just goes to show doctors are as thick as two short planks! It all comes out of evolutionary theory, the denial of a creator and designer. We are fearfully and wonderfully made.
Hello child. Thank you for drawing my attention to a couple of minor spelling mistakes. I have edited.
By the way you have replied twice to me with the same reply. Does that make sense to you? :<)
And if you are going to quote me do make sure you do it properly. It is "We are fearfully and wonderfully made."
You believe in evolutionary theory do you? That explains it. You’re not a doctor by any chance?
The internet suggests there are 13 million doctors in the world right now so I suppose I can give you tens of millions, although it always helps to exaggerate to help make the point.
And yes, doctors really are indoctrinated fools. And to think I used to think they were clever before 2020. By the way ‘medical profession’ anagrams to ‘dim fecal poisoners’. That should have warned us!
In any event, I daresay you think that COVID 19 was a novel disease and that vaccines work.
We did all home births so none of my children got Vitamin K but I have heard is that one of the reason's for it was for bleeding from circumcision. Supposedly the way we do it in the West is different, removes more foreskin than the traditional method so the child will bleed more. Have you heard that argument before?
But then the hospitals would have to practice medicine rather than a blanket policy of giving ever children the same treatment. At least if they restricted it to males it would be somewhat making a science based decision.
What do you think practicing medicine means? Every newborn has extremely low levels of vitamin K. That’s why it’s a “blanket” recommendation. It isn’t recommended because of circumcision. It’s recommended to prevent catastrophic brain bleeds.
Did you not just read the article where the author postulates that their is a reason that babies have low vitamin k, and perhaps they were DESIGNED that way, and that medicine THINKS it is correcting a mistake but could in actuality be causing more health problems then is solves?
I take your posts exactly as written. It’s pretty common for Americans to assume people on social media know any claim or discussion is strictly about the US and are almost confused why anyone would reference one of the other two hundred countries.
I don’t think it really matters why you think it became a standard recommendation for every country including many that do not circumcise and never have unless medically necessary.
What I do think is strange is when someone keeps saying there’s evidence over and over but won’t link it. I don’t think any of my claims would take as long as a minute to find and link.
I wonder why you would support anyone chopping off a part of their child’s penis for no reason. Never mind that it has more nerve endings than any other part of the a boy’s body. The child will still experience incredible pain no matter the quantity of local or topical anaesthetic used. It will desensitise the head over time reducing sensitivity. Skipping over immediate complications that are not rare, the long term and permanent complications is a long list and may result in irreversible disfigurement, pain, loss of sexual function, and more. When this happens, the impacts on mental health are often substantial and long term. Shame, fear of rejection, of intimacy, of being seen as broken or disfigured. Often there is anger, resentment and a complete inability to trust their parent(s) for violating their bodily autonomy. Chronic depression, body dysmorphia and PTSD.
The chances of major complications increase ten fold when not done very soon after birth. By delaying till 12 months old result in a twenty fold increase. Recommending it be delayed to reduce the tiny chance of haemorrhage that couldn’t be managed by a medical doctor or surgeon increases the likelihood of all other severe complications by 1000%.
I’m not saying you believe circumcision should be performed, but recommending delaying until at least on solid food to reduce risk actually increases risk ten fold.
This is directed at people that think a vitamin K shot is too risky, but chopping off a child’s body parts isn’t.
I don’t understand how people who insist on my body, my choice and total bodily autonomy see no contradiction in taking that away from their child.
I don’t understand how parents think they can do a risk analysis when they fail to understand we know the likelihood of all minor adverse reactions, all major adverse reactions, the outcomes of each one. Data that has been consistent across decades, across scores of independent reporting systems, continuously updated and monitored in real time. Antivaxxers don’t understand the difference between an adverse event, an adverse reaction, or a side effect. The echo chamber insists only a fraction are reported, not reading the source for context. Common immune responses like pain at the injection site, fever, headache, fatigue etc are often not reported because those are quite common, and confirmation the immune system is doing its job.
Misinterpreting inserts, not understanding anything and everything occurred after the vaccine is listed. These are not side effects. They aren’t adverse reactions. They are adverse events which means no causal connection has been established, or anymore than baseline.
Failing to understand that about 1% percent of MMR recipients will develop a mild measles like rash, but thinking it can causes actual measles.
Inserts are legal documents written by lawyers not medical professionals “By listing every potential adverse event observed during clinical trials—even rare occurrences or events not yet proven to be directly caused by the vaccine—the manufacturer legally protects themselves against claims that they concealed risks.”
The second is directions for storage, preparation, dosage, method of injection etc for the qualified person preps the vaccine and/or administers it.
It is not intended for anyone except for those qualified to prep and administer the product.
Big pharma is framed as a bunch of old, rich men consumed with greed who don’t care about safety or efficacy. Depending on the AVs level of paranoia, fully complicit in selling a product they know to be dangerous or ineffective.
In reality big pharma is owned by shareholders. Those that have pensions funds, retirement plans, education savings. Frequently incorporated into mutual funds and ETFs. Anyone with a diversified portfolio is an owner, even if it’s a tiny, tiny fraction.
Pharmaceuticals are publicly owned companies who’s management knows a product with even tiny increased risk not investigated is a recipe for a plummeting stock price and long term reputation risk.
How are we to know you were only referring to American customs? Considering how circumcision of infants has dropped drastically over the last few decades and is no longer performed on the majority of infants, it wouldn’t be a custom either.
Does vitamin k reduce bleeding after male genital mutilation? Of course. Is it why it’s recommended? No. The major concern is devastating brain bleeds.
Who is “they”? I thought antivaxxers weren’t afraid so how is that even possible?
They don’t start producing vitamin k until they start on solids. Humans have only been around for 200,000 to 300,000 years. How long did you think we’ve been around for?
Science doesn’t assume anything. It proves a vitamin K shot saves lives.
The human lineage broke away from the common ancestor we share with chimpanzees roughly 6 to 7 million years ago. The earliest known species in our family tree from this era is Sahelanthropus tchadensis, which lived in Central Africa between 6 and 7 million years ago.
That you agree or not is irrelevant to the point. If we went with 1000 years ago, we still were not giving babies vitamin K - yet billions of babies over millenia grew to be healthy adults.
Science assumes we need exogenous help all the time for almost everything. Which flies in the face of reality - as i just showed you.
What you've highlighted is the biggest mistake that Western medicine makes, which is assuming that the body is flawed and doesn't know what it's doing, and that it needs intervention even from the moment of birth to be "healthy." Never even wondering if their intervention could be actually causing harm. This is of course writ large with vaccines. But even this seemingly benign injection has numerous potential consequences, as you outline. We come into the world with bodies that know how to be healthy.
Our bodies are wise beyond anything we have ever imagined, and your explanation here of why babies are born with low vitamin K is an excellent example. Our medical system and the people who run it need to drop the idea that they know more than the body of a newborn infant, or any other age human for that matter.
When my second son was born in 1983, it was with all of the low-risk conditions that you list. He was born at 2:30 in the morning in a hospital but in a room that was appointed like a bedroom, not a delivery room with all the bright lights and hard table, and I wanted to go home around noon rather than stay in the hospital another night and be woken up to have my blood pressure taken every three hours. They made me promise to bring him back to get that vitamin K shot, and I did. If I had only known! At least he was a couple of days old, not just a few hours, when he got it. And he doesn't have asthma or any other injury that I know of.
Midwives have been clearing newborns' airways since time immemorial. They have also not cut the umbilical cord immediately. The article on which my comment was posted went into detail about the potential harm of unnecessary vitamin K shots. There is evidence going back to the 18 century that vaccination is neither safe nor effective.
So you agree interventions are often needed starting at birth such as clearing the airway. Maybe using a ambu bag until the baby is breathing on their own. Shortly after birth intervention is required to cut the umbilical cord. Medicine doesn’t think a newborn is flawed. They all have very low levels of vitamin K which is just a fact. No judgement. Something that can be life threatening can be rectified with a vitamin thanks to science. I am not sure if you really believe medicine doesn’t ever consider if treatments may be harmful. Not only is it considered, it doesn’t become a recommended protocol without evidence of efficacy and safety.
Vitamin K is not a vaccine.
Bodies don’t know how to be healthy. The human body doesn’t think or know anything. Infants have primitive reflexes and that’s it.
I don’t understand how someone who has spent a decade learning everything currently known about human biology and chemistry, and sometimes many more years focusing on a specialty isn’t capable of producing better outcomes with that knowledge. And we know they do.
The article is full of easily debunked falsehoods and zero evidence that vitamin K shots are harmful. The vaccine/inoculation used in the 18th century was so effective, we eradicated that horrific disease with a huge morbidity and mortality rate. Vaccines have eradicated two devastating viruses that no longer exist outside of two BSL-4 labs. That is astounding and evidence they work.
There is zero evidence for not vaccinating. There’s zero evidence newborns are better off without the vitamin K shot.
There is overwhelming evidence for vaccinating. There’s tons of evidence for the vitamin K shot.
I think the issue is antivaxxers don’t understand what constitutes evidence. They don’t know how to vet a source or an expert. They don’t factcheck things themselves to see if they’re actually true.
This opinion piece doesn’t name the author. That doesn’t raise the tiniest of red flags for you? Definitely claims to be a MD, but definitely isn’t.
Our midwife advised against the K shots for both our children born in her independent birth clinic in 2005 and 2008 for exactly this reason. Her explanation was not quite so in depth as this, but it was clear she had some intuition that there was a good reason to allow the blood to remain lower in K at birth in most cases. Due to a hematoma on one kid’s head, she did end up advising the shot. The other kid never got it. It was also clear that she was breaking the law and risking her license in doing so. She was a brave midwife and reading this makes me realize how fortunate we were to be under her care.
Wow, excellent research! If only I could go back. My older son has asthma and adhd. No idea if it was due to the K shot or the vaccines or both, but I’d undo every last unnecessary medical intervention if I could do it over. I have learned so much since my kids were born (early nineties) It was all risk and no reward 😢
Anectodally, many parents report newborn jaundice after the Vit K injection. You mentioned liver issues, could these liver issues cause jaundice?
That’s a good point, and there’s a mechanism for this. Will have to look into it
Never claimed to be.
I was so looking forward to how to do “real science” Oliver. 🥹
Of note, vacuum and forceps are still commonly used, especially vacuum. In areas where attending physicians are still present who were properly trained on the use of forceps, these are also still very common, in my experience.
Who wrote this?
You are welcome.
It doesn’t make sense. One of my comments repeated four times. 🤷🏼♀️
I wasn’t quoting you, I was asking a question.
Do you understand the difference between a scientific theory and a layman’s theory?
I am not a doctor.
MDs are obviously in the tens of millions if you go back just a few decades. Well over a hundred million if we go back to when vaccines were introduced.
Exaggeration undermines credibility and isn’t something a person does if discussing in good faith.
How have they been indoctrinated? Do you know what that even means?
You think there was a cryptic message in the term medical profession? I’m very sincerely asking. How does the medical profession poison our poor?
I don’t think Covid is a novel disease. I know it is. There’s a reason it’s called COVID-19. I’m very interested if you have reputable citations that support otherwise. And curious what it was before 2019 if you don’t think it’s new.
I also don’t think vaccines work. I know they do. Nothing has studied more than vaccines and the evidence they work is overwhelming.
If this ends up posting multiple times I apologize in advance. I am only replying once.
So can you answer my questions now please?
The Israelites were told to circumcise infants on day 8. It is my understanding that vitamin K begins to rise on days 7 and 8. It’s obviously not a mistake but something that was intended and known (even though the didn’t know vitamin k specifically).
Absolutely fascinating thank you for your in depth reasoning, I had no idea of the underlying multiple systems.
I have a laymen’s question (one who hasn’t given birth to boot), would the letting the umbilical cord stay intact for longer which I’ve read is good for the baby help in any way with this also?
That’s a good question. Honestly, I am not sure - but I don’t think so.
The baby is not deficient or have low vitamin K when the lab value is incorrect.
Many thanks. Vit K injections for a non-existent problem. Suits big pharma only.
All this predicated on the fear of possible bleeding, not actual bleeding occurring.
"Doctors have assumed for decades that this is a mistake of nature"
Which just goes to show doctors are as thick as two short planks! It all comes out of evolutionary theory, the denial of a creator and designer. We are fearfully and wonderfully made.
Hello child. Thank you for drawing my attention to a couple of minor spelling mistakes. I have edited.
By the way you have replied twice to me with the same reply. Does that make sense to you? :<)
And if you are going to quote me do make sure you do it properly. It is "We are fearfully and wonderfully made."
You believe in evolutionary theory do you? That explains it. You’re not a doctor by any chance?
The internet suggests there are 13 million doctors in the world right now so I suppose I can give you tens of millions, although it always helps to exaggerate to help make the point.
And yes, doctors really are indoctrinated fools. And to think I used to think they were clever before 2020. By the way ‘medical profession’ anagrams to ‘dim fecal poisoners’. That should have warned us!
In any event, I daresay you think that COVID 19 was a novel disease and that vaccines work.
WHOA WHOA WHOA! Excellent article Doc!
We did all home births so none of my children got Vitamin K but I have heard is that one of the reason's for it was for bleeding from circumcision. Supposedly the way we do it in the West is different, removes more foreskin than the traditional method so the child will bleed more. Have you heard that argument before?
Yes. The cases of excessive bleeding from circumcision have been linked to why it is recommended. Btw - girls don’t get circumcised.
And if you are going to circumcise, wait until the baby’s own Vitamin K is elevated.
They use fear to bully you.
But then the hospitals would have to practice medicine rather than a blanket policy of giving ever children the same treatment. At least if they restricted it to males it would be somewhat making a science based decision.
What do you think practicing medicine means? Every newborn has extremely low levels of vitamin K. That’s why it’s a “blanket” recommendation. It isn’t recommended because of circumcision. It’s recommended to prevent catastrophic brain bleeds.
Did you not just read the article where the author postulates that their is a reason that babies have low vitamin k, and perhaps they were DESIGNED that way, and that medicine THINKS it is correcting a mistake but could in actuality be causing more health problems then is solves?
Not all of it.
How many incorrect assumptions do you need to read before you legitimately can dismiss the rest?
So you commented on an article where you ignore the entire thesis and supporting evidence?
AGAIN, don’t take my posts as black and white or 100% restricted without exceptions.
There is some evidence that circumcision bleeding is/was a factor. AND brain bleeds are a factor, and…….
So you claim. Why not link it?
I take your posts exactly as written. It’s pretty common for Americans to assume people on social media know any claim or discussion is strictly about the US and are almost confused why anyone would reference one of the other two hundred countries.
I don’t think it really matters why you think it became a standard recommendation for every country including many that do not circumcise and never have unless medically necessary.
What I do think is strange is when someone keeps saying there’s evidence over and over but won’t link it. I don’t think any of my claims would take as long as a minute to find and link.
I wonder why you would support anyone chopping off a part of their child’s penis for no reason. Never mind that it has more nerve endings than any other part of the a boy’s body. The child will still experience incredible pain no matter the quantity of local or topical anaesthetic used. It will desensitise the head over time reducing sensitivity. Skipping over immediate complications that are not rare, the long term and permanent complications is a long list and may result in irreversible disfigurement, pain, loss of sexual function, and more. When this happens, the impacts on mental health are often substantial and long term. Shame, fear of rejection, of intimacy, of being seen as broken or disfigured. Often there is anger, resentment and a complete inability to trust their parent(s) for violating their bodily autonomy. Chronic depression, body dysmorphia and PTSD.
The chances of major complications increase ten fold when not done very soon after birth. By delaying till 12 months old result in a twenty fold increase. Recommending it be delayed to reduce the tiny chance of haemorrhage that couldn’t be managed by a medical doctor or surgeon increases the likelihood of all other severe complications by 1000%.
I’m not saying you believe circumcision should be performed, but recommending delaying until at least on solid food to reduce risk actually increases risk ten fold.
This is directed at people that think a vitamin K shot is too risky, but chopping off a child’s body parts isn’t.
I don’t understand how people who insist on my body, my choice and total bodily autonomy see no contradiction in taking that away from their child.
I don’t understand how parents think they can do a risk analysis when they fail to understand we know the likelihood of all minor adverse reactions, all major adverse reactions, the outcomes of each one. Data that has been consistent across decades, across scores of independent reporting systems, continuously updated and monitored in real time. Antivaxxers don’t understand the difference between an adverse event, an adverse reaction, or a side effect. The echo chamber insists only a fraction are reported, not reading the source for context. Common immune responses like pain at the injection site, fever, headache, fatigue etc are often not reported because those are quite common, and confirmation the immune system is doing its job.
Misinterpreting inserts, not understanding anything and everything occurred after the vaccine is listed. These are not side effects. They aren’t adverse reactions. They are adverse events which means no causal connection has been established, or anymore than baseline.
Failing to understand that about 1% percent of MMR recipients will develop a mild measles like rash, but thinking it can causes actual measles.
Inserts are legal documents written by lawyers not medical professionals “By listing every potential adverse event observed during clinical trials—even rare occurrences or events not yet proven to be directly caused by the vaccine—the manufacturer legally protects themselves against claims that they concealed risks.”
The second is directions for storage, preparation, dosage, method of injection etc for the qualified person preps the vaccine and/or administers it.
It is not intended for anyone except for those qualified to prep and administer the product.
Big pharma is framed as a bunch of old, rich men consumed with greed who don’t care about safety or efficacy. Depending on the AVs level of paranoia, fully complicit in selling a product they know to be dangerous or ineffective.
In reality big pharma is owned by shareholders. Those that have pensions funds, retirement plans, education savings. Frequently incorporated into mutual funds and ETFs. Anyone with a diversified portfolio is an owner, even if it’s a tiny, tiny fraction.
Pharmaceuticals are publicly owned companies who’s management knows a product with even tiny increased risk not investigated is a recipe for a plummeting stock price and long term reputation risk.
And that group was not included in my comment as I was referring to American customs. You won’t find it in American hospitals - right?
How are we to know you were only referring to American customs? Considering how circumcision of infants has dropped drastically over the last few decades and is no longer performed on the majority of infants, it wouldn’t be a custom either.
Does vitamin k reduce bleeding after male genital mutilation? Of course. Is it why it’s recommended? No. The major concern is devastating brain bleeds.
Who is “they”? I thought antivaxxers weren’t afraid so how is that even possible?
Jewish girls are not circumcised. FGM is not a normal procedure legally performed in America.
No haven’t heard that one, thanks
We don’t need exogenous K
We don’t. Newborns do however.
They make their own. As we have for millions of years. Modern science now assumes we need so much exogenous help. We don't.
They don’t start producing vitamin k until they start on solids. Humans have only been around for 200,000 to 300,000 years. How long did you think we’ve been around for?
Science doesn’t assume anything. It proves a vitamin K shot saves lives.
The human lineage broke away from the common ancestor we share with chimpanzees roughly 6 to 7 million years ago. The earliest known species in our family tree from this era is Sahelanthropus tchadensis, which lived in Central Africa between 6 and 7 million years ago.
That you agree or not is irrelevant to the point. If we went with 1000 years ago, we still were not giving babies vitamin K - yet billions of babies over millenia grew to be healthy adults.
Science assumes we need exogenous help all the time for almost everything. Which flies in the face of reality - as i just showed you.
https://ifbacongrewontrees.wordpress.com/2026/05/06/vitamin-k-is-not-okay/
My wife trained as a midwife for a few years so she was the one who shared that detail with me.
What you've highlighted is the biggest mistake that Western medicine makes, which is assuming that the body is flawed and doesn't know what it's doing, and that it needs intervention even from the moment of birth to be "healthy." Never even wondering if their intervention could be actually causing harm. This is of course writ large with vaccines. But even this seemingly benign injection has numerous potential consequences, as you outline. We come into the world with bodies that know how to be healthy.
Our bodies are wise beyond anything we have ever imagined, and your explanation here of why babies are born with low vitamin K is an excellent example. Our medical system and the people who run it need to drop the idea that they know more than the body of a newborn infant, or any other age human for that matter.
When my second son was born in 1983, it was with all of the low-risk conditions that you list. He was born at 2:30 in the morning in a hospital but in a room that was appointed like a bedroom, not a delivery room with all the bright lights and hard table, and I wanted to go home around noon rather than stay in the hospital another night and be woken up to have my blood pressure taken every three hours. They made me promise to bring him back to get that vitamin K shot, and I did. If I had only known! At least he was a couple of days old, not just a few hours, when he got it. And he doesn't have asthma or any other injury that I know of.
I don’t know why my comment posted more than once.
I don’t care if you block me.
Are you not able to answer my questions?
Midwives have been clearing newborns' airways since time immemorial. They have also not cut the umbilical cord immediately. The article on which my comment was posted went into detail about the potential harm of unnecessary vitamin K shots. There is evidence going back to the 18 century that vaccination is neither safe nor effective.
So you agree interventions are often needed starting at birth such as clearing the airway. Maybe using a ambu bag until the baby is breathing on their own. Shortly after birth intervention is required to cut the umbilical cord. Medicine doesn’t think a newborn is flawed. They all have very low levels of vitamin K which is just a fact. No judgement. Something that can be life threatening can be rectified with a vitamin thanks to science. I am not sure if you really believe medicine doesn’t ever consider if treatments may be harmful. Not only is it considered, it doesn’t become a recommended protocol without evidence of efficacy and safety.
Vitamin K is not a vaccine.
Bodies don’t know how to be healthy. The human body doesn’t think or know anything. Infants have primitive reflexes and that’s it.
I don’t understand how someone who has spent a decade learning everything currently known about human biology and chemistry, and sometimes many more years focusing on a specialty isn’t capable of producing better outcomes with that knowledge. And we know they do.
The article is full of easily debunked falsehoods and zero evidence that vitamin K shots are harmful. The vaccine/inoculation used in the 18th century was so effective, we eradicated that horrific disease with a huge morbidity and mortality rate. Vaccines have eradicated two devastating viruses that no longer exist outside of two BSL-4 labs. That is astounding and evidence they work.
There is zero evidence for not vaccinating. There’s zero evidence newborns are better off without the vitamin K shot.
There is overwhelming evidence for vaccinating. There’s tons of evidence for the vitamin K shot.
I think the issue is antivaxxers don’t understand what constitutes evidence. They don’t know how to vet a source or an expert. They don’t factcheck things themselves to see if they’re actually true.
This opinion piece doesn’t name the author. That doesn’t raise the tiniest of red flags for you? Definitely claims to be a MD, but definitely isn’t.
Thank you for your respectful response.
I can’t tell if this is a parody account
You would if you were actually an MD.
😂😂😂😂😂
Something we did not know when our last child was born
Vitamin K shot is not on the vaccine schedule
There was no mention of this prior to delivery
We chose no vaccines
In delivery room we are asked the question about Vitamin K
Never knew about it
Trying to research in a delivery room as your child is born
Cant get a signal, THEY say baby needs it
We say WTF, i guess if it is that important, go ahead
So sick and tired of the medical establishment
Our midwife advised against the K shots for both our children born in her independent birth clinic in 2005 and 2008 for exactly this reason. Her explanation was not quite so in depth as this, but it was clear she had some intuition that there was a good reason to allow the blood to remain lower in K at birth in most cases. Due to a hematoma on one kid’s head, she did end up advising the shot. The other kid never got it. It was also clear that she was breaking the law and risking her license in doing so. She was a brave midwife and reading this makes me realize how fortunate we were to be under her care.
We don’t need exogenous K
Amazing!
Wow, excellent research! If only I could go back. My older son has asthma and adhd. No idea if it was due to the K shot or the vaccines or both, but I’d undo every last unnecessary medical intervention if I could do it over. I have learned so much since my kids were born (early nineties) It was all risk and no reward 😢
💯👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🎩