Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christina Phillips's avatar

Thanks for taking this on. My work is with nonspeakers, the bulk of whom are ASD individuals on the end of the spectrum with more/most significant disability. If the “spectrum” concept with ASD is even valid (I’m not sure it is), I know nothing about those on the more subtle end of the spectrum. I’m only speaking for the others….

I agree it’s important to recognize causality is likely complex and multifaceted.

I strongly disagree about your hypothesis regarding behavioral modeling. These disabilities are MUCH deeper and parenting styles are incredibly diverse. In fact, I think using a behavioral lense with ASD is inherently the wrong take.

The guys I work with have what people label as problematic “behaviors” but misunderstand these as purposeful. The guys I work with have a major sensory-motor difficulty. They can know what they want/mean to do with their bodies all day long and can’t make it happen without help. They have minds that are intact and bodies that have a “mind of their own.” The major feature of their disability is sensory/motor. (I know there are other global systemic issues like digestion and immune system issues associated with ASD but I’m talking about the “behavioral” aspects that are used to diagnose.)

The reason these things are known/understood to some degree is through acquired communication skills with letter boards. It is motor disability that makes communication initially out of reach and it is a painstaking process of myelinating ingrated skills of thinking and doing simultaneously that yield an ability for them to testify to what their disability on their level of experience. There is no deficit in language. Receptive language is completely intact. They understand everything people are saying with spoken words. Expressive language skills can always be expanded and grown through use for all of us (the more I try to use words to express myself the more skilled I get at that; this is true for everyone).

The behavioral framework is the wrong framework. One researcher who gets the importance of looking at the sensory/motor origin of how behaviors present us Liz Torres. (I forget what university she’s out of - pretty sure it’s in NJ but might be PA).

Expand full comment
Stuart Hutt's avatar

I think there are too many neurological diseases that have names that may be related with no physical evidence/cause. This is great for pharma not wanting to find causal effect since it would hurt their revenue stream. The Vaxxx schedule has become ridiculous as neurological issues increase. Dr Christopher Exley has found toxic aluminum in brain biopsies of autism and alzheimer patients. 42 out of 45 vaccines have aluminum adjuvants. Based on Dr Robert Vogel study May 2025 the average adult male consumes over 4lb of aluminum in food and drink annually. Call me crazy but this is more evidence than pharma will come up with. But I think you are correct there are many causal effects that are related to poorly undefined diagnoses. Dr Coimbra has had success battling autism with high dose D3 since it is required for the immune system and the brain and every other cell. DR Andreas Kalcker has had success reversing autism in one of his family members with chlorine dioxide. I was wondering if iodine deficiency would play a role since 80% of us are and iodine is required for every cell including the brain. Iodine is a defense but it is also required for cellular secretion. Since the brain replaces the cholesterol about every 10 months, having sufficient iodine and D3 for the brain may help.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts